The Other Tradition of Modern Architecture
Colin St. John Wilson
Academy Editions, 1995, $38 paper, 128 pp., 150 illustrations
Reviewed by Lester Paul Korzilius
Approximately 260 words
Published in Oculus, March 1996
Colin St. John Wilson, architect of the British Library, presents a
theory of architecture directly descended from Hugo Haring, and the work
of Sharoun and Aalto. The initial CIAM meeting in 1928 at La Sarraz provides
the catalyst for Wilson's thesis, where there was a split between the organic
theories of Haring (CIAM's secretary), and the intellectual/abstract theories
of Corbusier and Mies van der Rohe.
Wilson passionately argues that buildings be designed from the inside
out, resulting in specific solutions factoring in all elements. Architecture
is a practical art whose virtue lies in the fulfillment of purpose, not
an intellectual abstraction that produces "art for art's sake." He reserves
particular vehemence for the International Style (and later Post Modernism)
for their preconceived styles that have no relation to the content or use
of the building. The arguments are well illustrated with projects primarily
of Scharoun and Aalto, and buildings by Haring, Duiker, Corbusier, Ernst
May, Wright, Mackintosh, Gropius, and an exceptional house by Eileen Gray.
This book is valuable for expounding a viable alternative tradition
within Modern Architecture. It would be stronger had Wilson been more impartial
and less of a crusader. For example, some architects working on organic
principles, e.g., Scharoun, have produced brilliant buildings that were
ill-suited to their external environ-ment. Corbusier is often used as the
antithesis, but without sufficient analysis about what gives this work
its particular strength. However, Wilson, as crusader, deserves credit
for re-igniting the passion of principle that underlay the Modern Movement,
that is unfortunately lacking in architectural discourse today.
Return to Home
Page |